Medicine is a science of uncertainty and an art of probability ...
 
                                  William Osler, MD
 

References

1. Rysavy M. Evidence-based medicine: a science of uncertainty and an art of probability. Virtual Mentor. 2013 Jan 1;15(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 23356799
2. Alizadehsani R, Roshanzamir M, Hussain S, et al. Handling of uncertainty in medical data using machine learning and probability theory techniques: a review of 30 years (1991-2020). Ann Oper Res. 2021 Mar 21:1-42. PubMed ID: 33776178
3. Guyatt GH. Evidence-based medicine. ACP J Club. 1991;114:A–16.
4. Guyatt GH, Rennie D. Users' guides to the medical literature. JAMA. 1993 Nov 3;270(17):2096-7. PubMed ID: 8411578
5. Lader EW. Acronym mania. Lancet. 2002 Aug 17;360(9332):576. PubMed ID: 12241699
6. Straus S, Haynes B, Glasziou P, Dickersin K, Guyatt G. Misunderstandings, misperceptions, and mistakes. ACP J Club. 2007. Jan-Feb;146(1):A8-9. PubMed ID: 17203920
7. Oxman AD, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH. Users' guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1993 Nov 3;270(17):2093-5. PubMed ID: 8411577
8. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1993 Dec 1;270(21):2598-601. PubMed ID: 8230645
9. Haynes RB, Wilczynski N. Finding the gold in MEDLINE: clinical queries. ACP J Club. 2005 Jan-Feb;142(1):A8-9. PubMed ID: 15656539
10. Haynes B, Haynes GA. ACP Journal Club. What does it take to put an ugly fact through the heart of a beautiful hypothesis? Ann Intern Med. 2009 Mar 17;150(6):JC3-2, JC3-3. PubMed ID: 19306483
11. DiCenso A, Bayley L, Haynes RB. ACP Journal Club Editorial: Accessing preappraised evidence: fine-tuning the 5S model into a 6S model. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Sep 15;151(6). PubMed ID: 19755349
12. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):71-2. PubMed ID: 8555924
13. Prorok JC, Iserman EC, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. The quality, breadth, and timeliness of content updating vary substantially for 10 online medical texts: an analytic survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;65(12):1289-95. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.05.003. PubMed ID: 22974495
14. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 25560714
15. Moons KG, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, et al. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):W1-73. PubMed ID: 25560730
16. Flegal KM, Cole TJ. Construction of LMS parameters for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2000 growth charts. Natl Health Stat Report. 2013 Feb 11;(63):1-3. PubMed ID: 24992748
17. Muhlenbruch K, Heraclides A, Steyerberg EW, et al. Assessing improvement in disease prediction using net reclassification improvement: impact of risk cut-offs and number of risk categories. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013 Jan;28(1):25-33. doi: 10.1007/s10654-012-9744-0. Epub 2012 Nov 20. PubMed ID: 23179629
18. Leening MJ, Cook NR. Net reclassification improvement: a link between statistics and clinical practice. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013 Jan;28(1):21-3. doi: 10.1007/s10654-012-9759-6. Epub 2013 Jan 5. PubMed ID: 23291877
19. Leening MJ, Vedder MM, Witteman JC, et al. Net reclassification improvement: computation, interpretation, and controversies: a literature review and clinician's guide. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jan 21;160(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 24592497
20. Caplan LR. Scores of Scores. JAMA Neurol. 70(2):252-253. PubMed ID: 23165963
21. Concato J. Probability, uncertainty, and prostate cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):211-2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00012. PubMed ID: 23381041
22. Cornell JE, Laine C. The science and art of deduction: complex systematic overviews. Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 20;148(10):786-8. PubMed ID: 18490692
23. Edlow JA. Risk stratification in TIA patients: "It's the vascular lesion, stupid!". Neurology. 2012 Sep 4;79(10):958-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31825f9e68. Epub 2012 Jun 13. PubMed ID: 22700808
24. Feinstein AR. Multi-item "instruments" vs Virginia Apgar's principles of clinimetrics. Arch Intern Med. 1999 Jan 25;159(2):125-8. PubMed ID: 9927093
25. Gordon WJ, Polansky JM, Boscardin WJ, et al. Coronary risk assessment by point-based vs. equation-based Framingham models: significant implications for clinical care. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Nov;25(11):1145-51. Epub 2010 Sep 8. PubMed ID: 20824362
26. Hayden JA, van der Windt DA, Cartwright JL, et al. Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 19;158(4):280-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009. PubMed ID: 23420236
27. Hayden JA, Cote P, Bombardier C. Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Mar 21;144(6):427-37. PubMed ID: 16549855
28. Katz MH. Multivariable analysis: a primer for readers of medical research. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Apr 15;138(8):644-50. PubMed ID: 12693887
29. Laupacis A, Sekar N, Stiell IG. Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA. 1997 Feb 12;277(6):488-94. Review. PubMed ID: 9020274
30. Localio AR, Goodman S. Beyond the usual prediction accuracy metrics: reporting results for clinical decision making. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Aug 21;157(4):294-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-4-201208210-00014. PubMed ID: 22910942
31. McGinn T. Practice corner: using clinical prediction rules. ACP J Club. 2002 Sep-Oct;137(2):A11-2. PubMed ID: 12207456
32. Muller-Riemenschneider F, Holmberg C, Rieckmann N, et al. Barriers to routine risk-score use for healthy primary care patients: survey and qualitative study. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 26;170(8):719-24. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.66. PubMed ID: 20421559
33. Hunder GG. The use and misuse of classification and diagnostic criteria for complex diseases. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Sep 1;129(5):417-8. PubMed ID: 9735071
34. Reilly BM, Evans AT. Translating clinical research into clinical practice: impact of using prediction rules to make decisions. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Feb 7;144(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 16461965
35. Yealy DM, Auble TE. Choosing between clinical prediction rules. N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 25;349(26):2553-5. PubMed ID: 14695417
36. Wegwarth O, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, et al. Do physicians understand cancer screening statistics? A national survey of primary care physicians in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 6;156(5):340-9. doi: 10.1059/0003-4819-156-5-201203060-00005. PubMed ID: 22393129
37. Mills EJ, Ioannidis JP, Thorlund K, et al. How to use an article reporting a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012 Sep 26;308(12):1246-53. PubMed ID: 23011714
38. Frankovich J, Longhurst CA, Sutherland SM. Evidence-based medicine in the EMR era. N Engl J Med. 2011 Nov 10;365(19):1758-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1108726. Epub 2011 Nov 2. PubMed ID: 22047518
39. Kent DM, Shah ND. Risk models and patient-centered evidence: should physicians expect one right answer? JAMA. 2012 Apr 18;307(15):1585-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.469. PubMed ID: 22511683
40. Perla RJ. The physics of health care improvement. JAMA. 2011 Jun 1;305(21):2223-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.735. PubMed ID: 21632486
41. Alberg AJ, Park JW, Hager BW, et al. The use of "overall accuracy" to evaluate the validity of screening or diagnostic tests. J Gen Intern Med. 2004 May;19(5 Pt 1):460-5. Review. PubMed ID: 15109345
42. Leeflang MM, Deeks JJ, Gatsonis C, Bossuyt PM; Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Working Group. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Dec 16;149(12):889-97. PubMed ID: 19075208
43. Janes H, Pepe MS, Gu W. Assessing the value of risk predictions by using risk stratification tables. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 18;149(10):751-60. PubMed ID: 19017593
44. Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters. Volume 27, Issue 8, June 2006, p. 861-744.
45. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 7063747
46. Cook NR. Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction. Circulation. 2007 Feb 20;115(7):928-35. PubMed ID: 17309939
47. Pepe MS, Janes H, Gu JW. Letter by Pepe et al regarding article, "Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction". Circulation. 2007 Aug 7;116(6):e132; author reply e134. PubMed ID: 17679623
48. Wellbery C. The value of medical uncertainty? Lancet. 2010 May 15;375(9727):1686-7. PubMed ID: 20480942
49. Editor comment. Uncertainty in medicine. Lancet. 2010 May 15;375(9727):1666. PubMed ID: 20480939
50. Smith GC, Pell JP. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2003 Dec 20;327(7429):1459-61. Review. PubMed ID: 14684649
51. Chong CA. Don't read this article. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Apr 2;158(7):566-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-7-201304020-00012. PubMed ID: 23546571
52. Brancati FL. A piece of my mind. Morning distort. JAMA. 1991 Sep 25;266(12):1627. PubMed ID: 1886180
53. Brancati FL. The art of pimping. JAMA. 1989 Jul 7;262(1):89-90. PubMed ID: 2733128
54. Bright TJ, Wong A, Dhurjati R, Bristow E, et al. Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 3;157(1):29-43. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201207030-00450. Review. PubMed ID: 22751758
55. Schlessinger L, Eddy DM. Archimedes: a new model for simulating health care systems--the mathematical formulation. J Biomed Inform. 2002 Feb;35(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 12415725
56. Eddy DM. The origins of evidence-based medicine--a personal perspective. Virtual Mentor. 2011 Jan 1;13(1):55-60. doi:10.1001/virtualmentor.2011.13.1.mhst1-1101. PubMed ID: 23134763
57. Taksler GB, Keshner M, Fagerlin A, et al. Personalized estimates of benefit from preventive care guidelines: a proof of concept. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Aug 6;159(3):161-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-3-201308060-00005. PubMed ID: 23922061
58. Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang S, et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Nov-Dec;10(6):523-30. PubMed ID: 12925543
59. Hauptman PJ, Armbrecht ES, Chibnall JT, et al. Errata in medical publications. Am J Med. 2014 Aug;127(8):779-785.e1. PubMed ID: 24662621
60. Moons KG, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, et al. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):W1-W73. PubMed ID: 25560730
61. Fitzgerald M, Saville BR, Lewis RJ. Decision curve analysis. JAMA. 2015 Jan 27;313(4):409-10. PubMed ID: 25626037
62. Barnett GO, Winickoff R, Dorsey JL, et al. Quality assurance through automated monitoring and concurrent feedback using a computer-based medical information system. Med Care. 1978 Nov;16(11):962-70. PubMed ID: 101723
63. Rothman MJ, Rothman SI, Beals J 4th. Development and validation of a continuous measure of patient condition using the Electronic Medical Record. J Biomed Inform. 2013 Oct;46(5):837-48. PubMed ID: 23831554
64. Schadow G, McDonald CJ, Suico JG, et al. Units of measure in clinical information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 Mar-Apr;6(2):151-62. PubMed ID: 10094068
65. Chyjek K, Farag S, Chen KT. Rating Pregnancy Wheel Applications Using the APPLICATIONS Scoring System. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;125(6):1478-83. PubMed ID: 26000520
66. Sniderman AD, D'Agostino RB Sr, Pencina MJ. The Role of Physicians in the Era of Predictive Analytics. JAMA. 2015 Jul 7;314. PubMed ID: 26151261
67. Parsh J, Seth M, Aronow H, et al. Choice of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Equation Impacts Drug-Dosing Recommendations and Risk Stratification in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jun 30;65(25):2714-23. PubMed ID: 26112195
68. Taner MT, Sezen B, Atwat K. A comparison of two diagnostic performance measures: signal-to-noise ratio versus partial area under receiver operating characteristic curve. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2013;26(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 23534147
69. Silver D, Huang A, Maddison CJ, Guez A, et al. Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature. 2016 Jan 28;529(7587):484-9. PubMed ID: 26819042
70. Sim I. Two Ways of Knowing: Big Data and Evidence-Based Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Apr 19;164(8):562-3. PubMed ID: 26809201
71. Jung CG, Hull RFC. Synchronicity; an acausal connecting principle. Translated by R. F. C. Hull. Princeton, N.J.; Princeton University Press, 1973. LCCN: 73011838
72. Dziadzko MA, Gajic O, Pickering BW, Herasevich V. Clinical calculators in hospital medicine: Availability, classification, and needs. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016 Sep;133:1-6. PubMed ID: 27393794
73. Mandel JC, Kreda DA, Mandl KD, et al. SMART on FHIR: a standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Sep;23(5):899-908. PubMed ID: 26911829
74. Scott IA. Machine Learning and Evidence-Based Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jul 3;169(1):44-46. PubMed ID: 29710098
75. Carpenter CR, Cone DC, Sarli CC. Using publication metrics to highlight academic productivity and research impact. Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;21(10):1160-72. PubMed ID: 25308141
76. Moons KGM, Wolff RF, Riley RD, et al. PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):W1-W33. PubMed ID: 30596876
77. Wolff RF, Moons KGM, Riley RD, et al. PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies. Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 30596875
78. Hauser RG, Quine DB, Ryder A, Campbell S. Unit conversions between LOINC codes. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Feb 1;25(2):192-196. PubMed ID: 28637208
79. Vreeman DJ, Abhyankar S, McDonald CJ. Response to Unit conversions between LOINC codes. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 May 1;25(5):614-615. PubMed ID: 29025119
80. King AJ, Cooper GF, Hochheiser H, et al. Using Machine Learning to Predict the Information Seeking Behavior of Clinicians Using an Electronic Medical Record System. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:673-682. PubMed ID: 30815109
81. Barda AJ, Ruiz VM, Gigliotti T, Tsui FR. An argument for reporting data standardization procedures in multi-site predictive modeling: case study on the impact of LOINC standardization on model performance. JAMIA Open. 2019 Apr;2(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 30944914
82. Amarasekera M. Immunoglobulin E in health and disease. Asia Pac Allergy. 2011 Apr;1(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 22053291
83. Alper BS, Oettgen P, Kunnamo I, et al. GRADE Working Group. Defining certainty of net benefit: a GRADE concept paper. BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 4;9(6):e027445. PubMed ID: 31167868
84. Stram M, Gigliotti T, Hartman D, et al. Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes for Laboratorians. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019 Jun 20. PubMed ID: 31219342
85. Kent DM, Paulus JK, van Klaveren D, et al. The Predictive Approaches to Treatment effect Heterogeneity (PATH) Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2019; Nov 12. PubMed ID: 31711134
86. Kent DM, van Klaveren D, Paulus JK, et al. The Predictive Approaches to Treatment effect Heterogeneity (PATH) Statement: Explanation and Elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2019; Nov 12. PubMed ID: 31711094
87. Vyas DA, Eisenstein LG, Jones DS. Hidden in Plain Sight - Reconsidering the Use of Race Correction in Clinical Algorithms. N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 27;383(9):874-882. PubMed ID: 32853499
88. Ritchie J, Welch B. Categorization of Third-Party Apps in Electronic Health Record App Marketplaces: Systematic Search and Analysis. JMIR Med Inform. 2020 May 29;8(5):e16980. PubMed ID: 32469324
89. Chou JH, Roumiantsev S, Singh R. PediTools Electronic Growth Chart Calculators: Applications in Clinical Care, Research, and Quality Improvement. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jan 30;22(1):e16204. PubMed ID: 32012066
90. Daly R. Where IT really matters: Top 25 Clinical Informaticists have moved beyond implementation issues and are taking information technology to the next level. Mod Healthc. 2012 Nov 5;42(45):26-31. PubMed ID: 23205401
91. Soares M, Dongelmans DA. Why should we not use APACHE II for performance measurement and benchmarking? Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva. 2017 29:3; 268-270. PubMed ID: 28876406
92. Tipton K, Leas BF, Flores E, et al. Impact of Healthcare Algorithms on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health and Healthcare. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). 2023 Dec. Report No.: 24-EHC004. PubMed ID: 38147523
93. Siddique SM, Tipton K, Leas B, et al. The Impact of Health Care Algorithms on Racial and Ethnic Disparities : A Systematic Review. Ann Intern Med. 2024 Mar 12. PubMed ID: 38467001

Associated Medical Subject Headings [MeSH]
 

21st Century,   80 and over,   APACHE,   Abbreviations as Topic,   Accidents,   Acute Kidney Injury,   Adolescent,   Adult,   Advertising as Topic,   Age Factors,   Aged,   Algorithms,   Anticoagulants,   Anxiety Disorders,   Apgar Score,   Area Under Curve,   Aspirin,   Attitude of Health Personnel,   Authorship,   Aviation,   Awards and Prizes,   Benchmarking,   Bias,   Bias (Epidemiology),   Bibliometrics,   Biological,   Biological Markers,   Biomedical Research,   Breast Neoplasms,   Calibration,   Cardiology,   Cardiovascular,   Cardiovascular Diseases,   Cell Phones,   Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.),   Cervical Vertebrae,   Checklist,   Child,   Child Development,   Cholesterol,   Chronic,   Chronic Disease,   Clinical,   Clinical Competence,   Clinical Decision Rules,   Clinical Decision-Making,   Clinical Laboratory Information Systems,   Clinical Medicine,   Clinical Trials as Topic,   Cohort Studies,   Computational Biology,   Computer Simulation,   Computer-Assisted,   Computerized,   Computers,   Concept Formation,   Concurrent Review,   Confounding Factors (Epidemiology),   Continental Population Groups,   Continuing,   Coronary Disease,   Cost-Benefit Analysis,   Critical Care,   Data Interpretation,   Databases,   Datasets as Topic,   Death,   Decision Making,   Decision Support Systems,   Decision Support Techniques,   Delivery of Health Care,   Delphi Technique,   Diabetes Mellitus,   Diagnosis,   Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures,   Diagnostic Tests,   Differential,   Early Detection of Cancer,   Education,   Electronic Health Records,   European Continental Ancestry Group,   Evaluation Studies as Topic,   Evidence-Based Medicine,   Factual,   Family Practice,   Female,   Fibrinolytic Agents,   Financial Management,   Focus Groups,   Fourier Analysis,   Games,   Glomerular Filtration Rate,   Grateful Med,   Growth Charts,   Guidelines as Topic,   HDL,   Handheld,   Health Care Surveys,   Health Information Interoperability,   Health Level Seven,   Health Maintenance Organizations,   Health Promotion,   Health Services Needs and Demand,   Health Services Research,   Health Status,   Healthcare Disparities,   History,   Hospital,   Hospital Medicine,   Hospitals,   Humans,   Image-Guided Biopsy,   Incidence,   Individuality,   Infant,   Information Seeking Behavior,   Information Storage and Retrieval,   Information Systems,   Inservice Training,   Intensive Care Units,   International Classification of Diseases,   Internet,   Internship and Residency,   Interventional,   Ischemic Attack,   Journal Impact Factor,   Knowledge,   LDL,   Laboratories,   Life Expectancy,   Linear Models,   Lipoproteins,   Literature,   Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes,   Logistic Models,   Low Back Pain,   Lung Neoplasms,   Lupus Erythematosus,   MEDLARS,   MEDLINE,   Machine Learning,   Magnetic Resonance Imaging,   Male,   Mammography,   Markov Chains,   Mass Screening,   Mathematical Computing,   Mathematical Concepts,   Mathematics,   Medical,   Medical History Taking,   Medical Informatics,   Medical Informatics Applications,   Medical Records,   Medical Records Systems,   Medicine in Art,   Medicine in Literature,   Meta-Analysis as Topic,   Middle Aged,   Minnesota,   Mobile Applications,   Models,   Modern,   Monte Carlo Method,   Mortality,   Multivariate Analysis,   Neck Injuries,   Neoplasms,   Nephrology,   Neural Networks (Computer),   Newborn,   Nonpenetrating,   Nutrition Surveys,   Obstetrics,   Odds Ratio,   Organizational Innovation,   Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care),   Paroxetine,   Patient Care,   Patient Discharge,   Patient Participation,   Patient Readmission,   Patient Selection,   Patients,   Peer Review,   Percutaneous Coronary Intervention,   Periodicals as Topic,   Pharyngitis,   Philosophy,   Physical Examination,   Physician''s Role,   Physician's Practice Patterns,   Physician-Patient Relations,   Physicians,   Physics,   Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors,   Poetry as Topic,   Point-of-Care Systems,   Practice Guidelines as Topic,   Predictive Value of Tests,   Pregnancy,   Preschool,   Preventive Health Services,   Primary Care,   Primary Health Care,   Primary Prevention,   Probability,   Prognosis,   Programming Languages,   Proportional Hazards Models,   Prospective Studies,   Prostate-Specific Antigen,   Prostatic Neoplasms,   Protective Devices,   Psychometrics,   Public Health,   Publication Bias,   Publishing,   Quality of Health Care,   Questionnaires,   ROC Curve,   Radiologic,   Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic,   Reading,   Recreational,   Reference Standards,   Reference Values,   Reinforcement (Psychology),   Renal Insufficiency,   Reproducibility of Results,   Research,   Research Design,   Respiratory Insufficiency,   Retrospective Studies,   Review Literature as Topic,   Risk Assessment,   Risk Factors,   Routine,   Sensitivity and Specificity,   Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors,   Severity of Illness Index,   Sex Factors,   Signal-To-Noise Ratio,   Software,   Spinal Fractures,   Statistical,   Statistics as Topic,   Streptococcal Infections,   Stroke,   Sudden,   Supervised Machine Learning,   Survival Rate,   Systematic Reviews as Topic,   Systemic,   Technology,   Telemedicine,   Theoretical,   Therapy,   Thrombosis,   Time Factors,   Tomography,   Transient,   Traumatology,   Treatment Outcome,   Type 2,   Ultrasonography,   Uncertainty,   United States,   Urology,   User-Computer Interface,   Utilization Review,   Vasculitis,   Weights and Measures,   Wit and Humor as Topic,   Women,   Workforce,   Wounds,   Wounds and Injuries,   X-Ray Computed,   Young Adult

 

Legal Notices and Disclaimer   All information contained in and produced by the EBMcalc system is provided for educational purposes only. This information should not be used for the diagnosis or treatment of any health problem or disease. THIS INFORMATION IS NOT INTENDED TO REPLACE CLINICAL JUDGMENT OR GUIDE INDIVIDUAL PATIENT CARE IN ANY MANNER. Click here for full notice and disclaimer.   EBMcalc is Copyright © 1998-2024 Foundation Internet    [Build 272728 v24.2]